TRD101: Incompetent is as ....................
I've spent 20+ years as a management consultant. I have had the privilege to meet or deal with some of the very best CEO's and senior executives in a variety of companies: from startups to Fortune 100 conglomerates. There is this romantic notion that business CEO's, especially those in large companies, are the best and brightest. Let's stop the romance now.
It was my experience that between 10% and 20% of these senior executives were very competent. The majority were average, at best, and approximately 25% needed a GPS to find their way to and from the bathroom. These less-than-stellar executives were frontmen/salesmen. They weren't very bright, but made their way up the organizational chart on charm, guile, being in the right place at the right time, and too often, sheer dumb luck.
I worked (as an employee) for one of these frontmen at a well-known, highly venture financed start-up high technology company 20 years ago. It was no secret that his executive assistant really ran the company, though she was so deft at what she did, she left few fingerprints about what she did behind.
I was employee number 8 at this company. I had an interview with this executive before being hired. Over 18 months, I had been in group meetings on a variety of topics which he chaired. My role had evolved so that I was the "minister without portfolio" for the company. On any day, I might have been involved with manufacturing, computers, marketing, sales and/or administration issues. At the time, I was getting involved in developing the company's new strategic plan, a plan that would be used for raising the next round of financing.
The CEO's executive assistant saw me walking by and called me over. She had a big smile on her face. She said, "Mike, Mr. (CEO) asked me who you were. He thought you were our account representative from Digital Equipment Corporation. He was wondering why you, as a competitor, were attending so many important meetings. I told him who you were and that you were one of our most valued employees."
And the employee in the process of writing the strategic plan which would greatly increase the value of his stock options.
It's ironic that the Bush Presidency was to be "the CEO" presidency because it has had so many failed CEO's in senior positions. The only excellent CEO amongst the Bush Leaguers, Paul O'Neill, former Secretary of the Treasury and CEO of Alcoa, got quickly pushed out because he wanted to deal with the real issues of the day, not a preconceived and out-of-touch ideological agenda. The best CEO's set a strategic direction, but adjust it to deal with real-world exigencies.
The backgrounds of the remaining CEO's in office are not stellar. George Bush, failed CEO of 2 companies that were bailed out by rich family connections. Dick Cheney, formerCEO of Halliburton, which almost has gone bankrupt by the acquisitio of Brown & Root, entangled in the huge asbestos class-action lawsuit. Donald Rumsfeld, CEO of Searle, which only started to do well again after Rumsfeld, but not before he helped push through the FDA approval of the carcinogenic Aspertame before all of the scientific tests were performed. John Snow, former CEO of CSX Corporation, whose last action in office was to sell CSX's container business to the Carlyle Group, the mysterious investment banking company populated by the Bush family retainers and friends.
The best strategic plan developed by the Bush-Leaguers was the Future of Iraq Project developed by Colin Powell's State Department. If you haven't read it, and you have any interest in what's going on in Iraq, you need to read it. Powell's multi-year effort, accumulating the knowledge and insights of hundreds of experts with different basis of knowledge to develop realistic scenarios on what would happen in Iraq if various actions were taken. The unfortunate course of events that have happened in Iraq, including the impending civil war, were predicted by the Future of Iraq Project.
Instead of this well-researched and well-considered plan, the Bush Leaguers appear to mostly have relied upon the input of a group of "dead-enders" and frauds comprising the Iraqi National Congress, headed by the shady and suspect Ahmed Chalabi. Given that the members of the INC had not been in Iraq for many years, and were subsisting (very well) from US government payments, it should have been obvious that the INC members were going to tell those in power that they wanted to hear, which somehow coincided with the agenda of the ING gaining power in Iraq.
The disaster that is Iraq did not have to happen. What has haapened is sheer incompetency.
TRD101 knows this: incompetent CEO's have incompetent people around them and push out the competent who challenge them. What happens while they are in power are all too predictable. Incompentent is as incompentent does.
And that's the Real Deal's basics for today, like it or not.
Tuesday, February 28, 2006
Friday, June 24, 2005
The Pursuit of ..........?
TRD101: The Pursuit of ......?
Will someone please explain to me how the current health care system helps promote “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”? Those who can’t afford or can’t get health insurance only seek treatment when they absolutely need it, often too late to be cured. Some have been denied needed treatment because of inability to pay their bills expeditiously. Most of us who do have health insurance are increasingly worried about losing it, especially those of us of child-bearing and child-raising age or are nearing retirement .Those of you lucky few who aren’t worried about losing their health insurance still have to deal with an increasingly bureaucratic and bizarre healthcare system. Trying to get treatment is not for the sick.
I’m one of the fortunate ones to have excellent healthcare coverage, through my wife’s employer. However, she works for a small business that had a scare of possibly losing its coverage. Fortunately, the scare was unnecessary, it was an administrative mix up, but all employees and their families were very nervous until continuing coverage was confirmed.
The coverage is PPO, Preferred Provider Organization, which means that you have to select a PCP, Primary Care Provider, from the insurer’s recommended list, it’s “network’ of healthcare professionals. Some insurers allow you to keep your existing out-of-PPO-network PCP and some don’t. PPOs differ from HMOs, Health Maintenance Organization, by allowing you to use an ONP, out-of-network provider, provided you get a referral from your PCP first. That I have to know what the acronyms PPO, HMO, PCP and ONP mean is worrisome.
I have a medical condition that requires the periodic review of a specialist. Even though I live in the greater Boston area, which has the greatest concentration of and some of best doctors in the world, it’s a pain in the keister to go into Boston, unless absolutely necessary. I’ve found a local specialist, but he’s an ONP. I’ve being seeing him for approximately one year and had no insurance problems previously. Out of the blue, his staff informed me that I had to get the approval of my PCP before they’d agree to set up the appointment.
I like this specialist a lot because he doesn’t suffer from MD - Me Doctor - syndrome. We jointly review my status and decide on changes to the treatment program. Since I have the time and resources to find current research on my condition, I do the research, and he accepts that I’m not a doctor wannabe trying to tell him what to do. Or he hasn’t told me that I’m not a doctor wannabe telling him what to do, yet.
So I called my PCP. Her full-time insurance administrator informed me that I couldn’t get a referral because the specialist was ONP. I called the insurance company’s customer service and explained my situation, including their previous payments. No problem, the representative told me, just set up the appointment. Which I did - but now I couldn’t be “squeezed in” for six weeks.
Six weeks minus one day later, I get a phone call from the ONP’s full-time insurance administrator cancelling the next-day’s appointment. Three days and eight phone calls with the PCP’s administrator, the ONP’s administrator, and the insurance company later, I get the appointment rescheduled - squeezing me in five weeks later - but, only if I prepaid the doctor’s fee. What choice did I have?
Eleven weeks from the day of my first phone call and three hours in an overheated waiting area, I finally get in to the ONP specialist’s office. I asked his nurse-practitioner what was the problem. She told me since I was out-of-the-specialist’s insurance network, my status was changed to “referral only”. No referral, no appointment. I asked what had changed over the past year of visits. She looked into my file.
“Nothing has changed. We made an administrative error in changing your status. We have had a number of patients who are on referral status who haven’t paid their bills, but you have.”
The doctor came into the room. He looked at me and shook his head, “Why weren’t you here eleven weeks ago when you were supposed to be?” I told him, in explicit detail. After all, I was paying for his time to be there.
He scheduled my next monthly appointment, right there and right then.
As management consultants, my partners and I had to deal with some of the most screwed-up companies in the world, but since we didn’t specialize in healthcare, we had no healthcare clients. Healthcare companies, like most industries in trouble, believe their industry is unique and require being managed differently. Unless you specialize in healthcare consulting, then supposedly you “don’t know the business”. Oh, I know their business, all too well.
In retrospect, I don’t know if not consulting in healthcare was good, because we might have been able to effectuate some changes in the system, or bad, because we would have driven ourselves crazy in the process trying to get any changes made. This craziness has to be infuriating to doctors, who did enter the profession to help sick people, not totally unlike consultants trying to help sick companies.
As a patient today, you have to spend way too much time pursuing the opportunity to get to see the doctors pursuing their passion. The current insurance company controlled system is too costly and inefficient. A single payer health care system would let doctors be doctors and patients not have to have extraordinary patience.
If I were a doctor, I would refuse having the insurance companies control my life, demand the liberty to treat patients as necessary and pursue my happiness to practice medicine, without being buried in paperwork. I especially would be torqued off being told what I know is good medicine by someone who doesn’t know the patient, hasn’t seen what I’ve seen, heard what I heard, or experienced what I’ve experienced.
Until the doctors take action, then the rest of our lives, liberty and pursuit of happiness are increasingly at risk.
TRD101 knows this: Sick companies only get well when the management and employees know they need to change and work together to make change happen. The US healthcare system is very sick and will only get well when patients and doctors work together to defeat the interests of the health insurance industry and change the current system.
And that's The Real Deal's basics for today, like it or not.
.
Will someone please explain to me how the current health care system helps promote “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”? Those who can’t afford or can’t get health insurance only seek treatment when they absolutely need it, often too late to be cured. Some have been denied needed treatment because of inability to pay their bills expeditiously. Most of us who do have health insurance are increasingly worried about losing it, especially those of us of child-bearing and child-raising age or are nearing retirement .Those of you lucky few who aren’t worried about losing their health insurance still have to deal with an increasingly bureaucratic and bizarre healthcare system. Trying to get treatment is not for the sick.
I’m one of the fortunate ones to have excellent healthcare coverage, through my wife’s employer. However, she works for a small business that had a scare of possibly losing its coverage. Fortunately, the scare was unnecessary, it was an administrative mix up, but all employees and their families were very nervous until continuing coverage was confirmed.
The coverage is PPO, Preferred Provider Organization, which means that you have to select a PCP, Primary Care Provider, from the insurer’s recommended list, it’s “network’ of healthcare professionals. Some insurers allow you to keep your existing out-of-PPO-network PCP and some don’t. PPOs differ from HMOs, Health Maintenance Organization, by allowing you to use an ONP, out-of-network provider, provided you get a referral from your PCP first. That I have to know what the acronyms PPO, HMO, PCP and ONP mean is worrisome.
I have a medical condition that requires the periodic review of a specialist. Even though I live in the greater Boston area, which has the greatest concentration of and some of best doctors in the world, it’s a pain in the keister to go into Boston, unless absolutely necessary. I’ve found a local specialist, but he’s an ONP. I’ve being seeing him for approximately one year and had no insurance problems previously. Out of the blue, his staff informed me that I had to get the approval of my PCP before they’d agree to set up the appointment.
I like this specialist a lot because he doesn’t suffer from MD - Me Doctor - syndrome. We jointly review my status and decide on changes to the treatment program. Since I have the time and resources to find current research on my condition, I do the research, and he accepts that I’m not a doctor wannabe trying to tell him what to do. Or he hasn’t told me that I’m not a doctor wannabe telling him what to do, yet.
So I called my PCP. Her full-time insurance administrator informed me that I couldn’t get a referral because the specialist was ONP. I called the insurance company’s customer service and explained my situation, including their previous payments. No problem, the representative told me, just set up the appointment. Which I did - but now I couldn’t be “squeezed in” for six weeks.
Six weeks minus one day later, I get a phone call from the ONP’s full-time insurance administrator cancelling the next-day’s appointment. Three days and eight phone calls with the PCP’s administrator, the ONP’s administrator, and the insurance company later, I get the appointment rescheduled - squeezing me in five weeks later - but, only if I prepaid the doctor’s fee. What choice did I have?
Eleven weeks from the day of my first phone call and three hours in an overheated waiting area, I finally get in to the ONP specialist’s office. I asked his nurse-practitioner what was the problem. She told me since I was out-of-the-specialist’s insurance network, my status was changed to “referral only”. No referral, no appointment. I asked what had changed over the past year of visits. She looked into my file.
“Nothing has changed. We made an administrative error in changing your status. We have had a number of patients who are on referral status who haven’t paid their bills, but you have.”
The doctor came into the room. He looked at me and shook his head, “Why weren’t you here eleven weeks ago when you were supposed to be?” I told him, in explicit detail. After all, I was paying for his time to be there.
He scheduled my next monthly appointment, right there and right then.
As management consultants, my partners and I had to deal with some of the most screwed-up companies in the world, but since we didn’t specialize in healthcare, we had no healthcare clients. Healthcare companies, like most industries in trouble, believe their industry is unique and require being managed differently. Unless you specialize in healthcare consulting, then supposedly you “don’t know the business”. Oh, I know their business, all too well.
In retrospect, I don’t know if not consulting in healthcare was good, because we might have been able to effectuate some changes in the system, or bad, because we would have driven ourselves crazy in the process trying to get any changes made. This craziness has to be infuriating to doctors, who did enter the profession to help sick people, not totally unlike consultants trying to help sick companies.
As a patient today, you have to spend way too much time pursuing the opportunity to get to see the doctors pursuing their passion. The current insurance company controlled system is too costly and inefficient. A single payer health care system would let doctors be doctors and patients not have to have extraordinary patience.
If I were a doctor, I would refuse having the insurance companies control my life, demand the liberty to treat patients as necessary and pursue my happiness to practice medicine, without being buried in paperwork. I especially would be torqued off being told what I know is good medicine by someone who doesn’t know the patient, hasn’t seen what I’ve seen, heard what I heard, or experienced what I’ve experienced.
Until the doctors take action, then the rest of our lives, liberty and pursuit of happiness are increasingly at risk.
TRD101 knows this: Sick companies only get well when the management and employees know they need to change and work together to make change happen. The US healthcare system is very sick and will only get well when patients and doctors work together to defeat the interests of the health insurance industry and change the current system.
And that's The Real Deal's basics for today, like it or not.
.
Tuesday, June 21, 2005
IMNSHO (IMNSHO)
TRD101: IMNSHO (It's My New Show, In My Not So Humble Opinion)
By Michael Maynard
There's no shortage of blogs already. Why create another?
Egotism - the belief that I have something new and different to say. Yes, it's
my not so humble opinions that will be written here frequently and hopefully daily.
I've written columns before, most recently for the Washington Post/Newsweek
syndicate. The columns were well received and fun to do.
That was 5 years ago. Times are a lot different now, even in that
short span.
At that time, it was Y2K that was going to be the end of the world as we know it.
I wrote that it wasn't going to be any big deal and to sit back and enjoy the
transition to the new millenium (technically which occured in 1/1/2001). I
mostly received favorable reviews which led to my 15 minutes of fame
on TV.
But I also received a lot of hate mail and some death threats from
the Armageddonists and the religious right, who accused me of
not taking the end of the world (as we know it) seriously.
I was going to rot in hell for advising others to do the same.
I blew them off and on 1/2/2000 , surprisingly enough, I stopped
getting mail from them. This was my first real interaction with the
general public and my first unreal interaction with the right-wing
lunatics who increasingly dominate media coverage.
9/11/2001 did change everything -- it was what was going to happen
on 1/1/2000 and a lot more. I still have nightmares about watching the
planes crash into the World Trade Center and the subsequent
collapse of the Twin Towers.
Y2K was amorphous to most people, a computer geek phenomenon in
cyberspace. There was no one person or group to specifically blame
for Y2K. It was those damn computers and networks who were taking over our lives.
9/11/2001 was, in contrast, all too real, and is etched upon this nation's psyche today.
The US wants to return to the 1950's with the suburban house, station wagon,
2 1/2 kids and the dog. We want Ike with his placid demeanor to let us all
know things will be alright, Chet and David to tell us the news and then we can
go back to being the Cleavers again.
There was no 24 hour news focused on the freak shows of the day. There were
no talking heads putting on their pre-staged biased rants confusing what the
real issues were. There was no Al Qaeda, no Internet pedophile predators,
no Fox News, no "reality shows", no no nos. You could trust the government,
the church, the banks, your employer and each other to do the right thing by you.
But no, in reality, you really couldn't and shouldn't have blindly trusted any of them.
Even Ike warned of the dangers of the military-industrial complex back then. All those
things we didn't want to know about in the 50's were there, just not as visible as they
are today. The seeds of Y2K were also started in the 1950's, all for the want of adding
two digits in the front of the date stored on computer disks.
Just as I needed to speak sensibily about the truth of what Y2K was all about, I again
feel the need to do so today. It's my (more or less) new show, and it's my not
so humble opinions that will be posted here. As it was 5 years ago, I intend and
hope for this to be a (sensible) dialogue between you and me.
And as it was 5 years ago, this is the TRD101, the Real Deal basics, for today, like it or not.
By Michael Maynard
There's no shortage of blogs already. Why create another?
Egotism - the belief that I have something new and different to say. Yes, it's
my not so humble opinions that will be written here frequently and hopefully daily.
I've written columns before, most recently for the Washington Post/Newsweek
syndicate. The columns were well received and fun to do.
That was 5 years ago. Times are a lot different now, even in that
short span.
At that time, it was Y2K that was going to be the end of the world as we know it.
I wrote that it wasn't going to be any big deal and to sit back and enjoy the
transition to the new millenium (technically which occured in 1/1/2001). I
mostly received favorable reviews which led to my 15 minutes of fame
on TV.
But I also received a lot of hate mail and some death threats from
the Armageddonists and the religious right, who accused me of
not taking the end of the world (as we know it) seriously.
I was going to rot in hell for advising others to do the same.
I blew them off and on 1/2/2000 , surprisingly enough, I stopped
getting mail from them. This was my first real interaction with the
general public and my first unreal interaction with the right-wing
lunatics who increasingly dominate media coverage.
9/11/2001 did change everything -- it was what was going to happen
on 1/1/2000 and a lot more. I still have nightmares about watching the
planes crash into the World Trade Center and the subsequent
collapse of the Twin Towers.
Y2K was amorphous to most people, a computer geek phenomenon in
cyberspace. There was no one person or group to specifically blame
for Y2K. It was those damn computers and networks who were taking over our lives.
9/11/2001 was, in contrast, all too real, and is etched upon this nation's psyche today.
The US wants to return to the 1950's with the suburban house, station wagon,
2 1/2 kids and the dog. We want Ike with his placid demeanor to let us all
know things will be alright, Chet and David to tell us the news and then we can
go back to being the Cleavers again.
There was no 24 hour news focused on the freak shows of the day. There were
no talking heads putting on their pre-staged biased rants confusing what the
real issues were. There was no Al Qaeda, no Internet pedophile predators,
no Fox News, no "reality shows", no no nos. You could trust the government,
the church, the banks, your employer and each other to do the right thing by you.
But no, in reality, you really couldn't and shouldn't have blindly trusted any of them.
Even Ike warned of the dangers of the military-industrial complex back then. All those
things we didn't want to know about in the 50's were there, just not as visible as they
are today. The seeds of Y2K were also started in the 1950's, all for the want of adding
two digits in the front of the date stored on computer disks.
Just as I needed to speak sensibily about the truth of what Y2K was all about, I again
feel the need to do so today. It's my (more or less) new show, and it's my not
so humble opinions that will be posted here. As it was 5 years ago, I intend and
hope for this to be a (sensible) dialogue between you and me.
And as it was 5 years ago, this is the TRD101, the Real Deal basics, for today, like it or not.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
